This is a preview and has not been published.

Performance Evaluation of a Triple Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger Using Deionized Water and Oil-40

Authors

  • Huda Majid Hasen Friction factor, Nusselt number, Overall heat transfer coefficient, Pressure drop, TCTHE, Triple concentric tube heat exchanger. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5505-4079

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2023.7584

Keywords:

Friction factor, Nusselt number, Overall heat transfer coefficient, Pressure drop, TCTHE, Triple concentric tube heat exchanger.

Abstract

This study examines experimentally the performance of a horizontal triple concentric tube heat exchanger TCTHE made of copper metal using water as cooling fluid and oil-40 as hot fluid. Hot fluid enters the inner annular tube of the TCTHE in a direction at a temperature of 50, 60 and 70 oC and a flow rate of 20 l/hr. On the other hand, the cooling fluid enters the inner tube and the outer annular tube in the reverse direction (counter current flow) at a temperature of 25 oC and flow rates of 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 l/hr. The TCTHE is composed of three copper tubes with outer diameters of 34.925 mm, 22.25 mm, and 9.525 mm, and thicknesses of 1.27 mm, 1.143 mm, and 0.762 mm, respectively. TCTHE tube's length was 670 mm. Nusselt number, overall heat transfer coefficient, convective heat transfer coefficient (CHTC), friction factor and pressure drop were measured from the obtained experimental results and plotted in graphs against Reynold number and volumetric flow rate of water. These parameters appeared good results in the cooling process. Nusselt numbers increased linearly with DIW flow rate for both C1 and C2 reaching maximum values of 38.25 and 14.64 respectively. CHTC increased linearly with the DIW flow rate for both C1 and C2 reaching maximum values of 2934.3 and 871.7 respectively. Overall heat transfer coefficient of DIW reached maximum values of 296.36 and 251.4 at 35 l/hr for C1 and C2, respectively. Friction factor DIW in C1 and C2 decreased with the volumetric flow rate increases, reaching minimum values of 0.04 and 0.25 respectively. Pressure drop of DIW increased linearly with flow rate reaching maximum values of 81.4 and 4.31 for C1 and C2 respectively. This in turn leads to reduced TCTHE length and size leading to a decrease in the construction cost of the heat exchanger.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zuritz CA. On the design of triple concentric-tube heat exchangers. J Food Process Eng. 1990; 12(2): 113–30.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.1990.tb00045.x

Radulescu S, Negoita I, Onutu I. Heat Transfer Coefficient Solver for a Triple Concentric-tube Heat Exchanger in Transition Regime. Rev Chim 2012; 63(8): 820–4. .

Ghiwala TM, Matawala VK. Sizing of triple concentric pipe heat exchanger. Int J Eng Dev Res. 2014; 2(2): 1683–92. https://www.ijedr.org/papers/IJEDR1402067.pdf

Hossain M, Uddin M, Hossen M, Afroz H. Experimental Analysis of a Triple Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger. Int J Mod Stud Mech Eng. 2017; 3(3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-9711.0303001

Pancholi M, Virani B. A basic review on triple concentric tube heat exchanger. Int J Adv Technol Eng Sci. 2017; 5(1): 350–4.

Tamkhade PK, Purandare PS, Lele MM. Thermal Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Triple Concentric Tube Heat Exchanger. Int J Eng Adv Technol. 2019; 8(6): 3898–905. http://doi.org/ 10.35940/ijeat.F7939.088619

Krishn C D, Rajeev A, Nilesh D, Amit K, Tech S. A review of triple concentric heat exchanger. Int J Curr Eng Sci Res. 2019; (9): 12–6.

Amanuel T, Mishra M. Thermohydraulic optimization of triple concentric-tube heat exchanger: A multi-objective approach. In: Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part E: J Process Mech. Eng. 2019; 233(3): 589–600.https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408918779232.

Reddy CS, Prasad PR, Krishnudu DM. Experimental Analysis of Triple Tube Heat Exchanger With TiO2 Nanofluid. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2020; 8(9): 1–7.

Nayak A, Singh SS, Parida AK, Bal BB, Pattnaik SK. An Experimental Approach for Enhancement of Heat Transfer Using TTHE : U Valve. Therm Eng. 2020; 141: 54290–3.

Vocale P, Malavasi M, Cattani L, Bozzoli F, Pelacci M, Rainieri S. Thermal characterisation of Triple Concentric Tube Heat Exchangers by applying parameter estimation : direct problem implementation. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021; 1868: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1868/1/012022

Tamkhade PK, Lele MM. Estimation of heat transfer coefficient for intermediate fluid stream in triple concentric tube heat exchanger. Int J Ambient Energy. 2021; 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2021.1888797

Rajab MH, Salih MO, Abdullah MA. Analysis the effecieny of a triple tubes heat exchanger based On Titanium dioxide Nano fluid and water method. J Mech Eng Res Dev. 2021; 44(5): 333–8. https://jmerd.net/Paper/Vol.44,No.5(2021)/333-338

Kılınç C. Upgrading the heat transfer in the concentric tube heat exchangers by using graphene/water nanofluid. Heat Transf Res. 2022; 53(3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.2021040799

Hussien FM, Faraj J, Hamad AJ. Experimental Investigation of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Performance based on Alumina and Copper Oxide Working Nanofluids. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021; (January 2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1105/1/012061

Hamza AM. Promoting Solar Cell Efficiencies via Employing Sliver- Carbon- Pomegranate Peel Nano System Abstract. Baghdad Sci J. 2019; 16(2): 370–5. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2019.16.2.0370

Saeed MA, Ghafoor DA, Yas RM, Hamid MK. Synthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles by Aluminum as a Reducing Agent. Baghdad Sci J. 2020; 17(1): 336–41. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2020.17.1(Suppl.).0336

Downloads

Issue

Section

article