Comparing Weibull Stress – Strength Reliability Bayesian Estimators for Singly Type II Censored Data under Different loss Functions

Main Article Content

Awatif Rezoky Mazaal
Nada Sabah Karam
Ghada Sabah Karam

Abstract

     The stress(Y) – strength(X) model reliability Bayesian estimation which defines life of a component with strength X and stress Y (the component fails if and only if at any time the applied stress is greater than its strength) has been studied, then the reliability; R=P(Y<X), can be considered as a measure of the component performance. In this paper, a Bayesian analysis has been considered for R when the two variables X and Y are independent Weibull random variables with common parameter α in order to study the effect of each of the two different scale parameters β and λ; respectively, using three different [weighted, quadratic and entropy] loss functions under two different prior functions [Gamma and extension of Jeffery] and also an empirical Bayes estimator Using Gamma Prior, for singly type II censored sample. An empirical study has been used to make a comparison between the three estimators of the reliability for stress – strength Weibull model, by mean squared error MSE criteria, taking different sample sizes (small, moderate and large) for the two random variables in eight experiments of different values of their parameters. It has been found that the weighted loss function was the best for small sample size, and the entropy and Quadratic were the best for moderate and large sample sizes under the two prior distributions and for empirical Bayes estimation.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Comparing Weibull Stress – Strength Reliability Bayesian Estimators for Singly Type II Censored Data under Different loss Functions. Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];18(2):0306. Available from: https://bsj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/BSJ/article/view/3011
Section
article

How to Cite

1.
Comparing Weibull Stress – Strength Reliability Bayesian Estimators for Singly Type II Censored Data under Different loss Functions. Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];18(2):0306. Available from: https://bsj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/BSJ/article/view/3011

References

Salim H, Akma N. Bayes Estimator for Exponential Distribution with Extension of Jeffery prior Information. MJMS. 2009;3(2).

Al-Dubaicy AR, Karam NS. The Lomax Bayesian estimation under a logarithm loss function . NTICT. 2017:40-45.

Karam GS, Abbas FI, Abood ZM, Kadhim KK, Karam NS. An enhanced approach for biomedical image restoration using image fusion techniques. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2018 May 24 (Vol. 1968, No. 1, p. 030028). AIP Publishing LLC.

Hussein AY. On the Bayes estimation of Exponentiated Gumbel Shape Parameter. Ms Thesis, Department of Mathematics, College of Education, Al-Mustansiriyah University; 2017.

Kasim A. Bayes Estimators of the Shape parameter of Exponentiated Rayleigh Distribution. Ms Thesis, Department of Mathematics, College of Education, Al-Mustansiriyah University; 2014.

Feroze N, Aslam M. Bayesian Analysis of Exponentiated Gamma Distribution under Type II Censored Samples. IJAST. 2012; 49.

Seuba J, Deville S, Guizard Ch, St A. The effect of wall thickness distribution on mechanical reliability and strength in unidirectional porous ceramics. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2016; 17(1): 128–135.

Mark AN. Parameter Estimation for the Two-Parameter Weibull Distribution. Brigham Young University – Provo: 2013.

AL-Noor NH, Saad Sh. Non-Bayes, Bayes and Empirical Bayes estimations for Reliability and failure rate function of Lomax distribution. MTM. 2015;3(2).

Li Ch, Hao H. Reliability of a Stress–Strength Model with Inverse Weibull DistributionIAENG Int. J. Appl. Math. 2017;47(3)10.

Asgharzadeh A, Valiollahi R, Raqab M.Z. Stress-strength reliability of Weibull distribution based on progressively censored samples. SORT. 2011;35(2):103-124.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.