Hybrid optimized data aggregation for fog computing devices in internet of things
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the recent few years, the applications using Internet of Things (IoT) are becoming extremely important as they facilitate continuous and seamless interactions among humans and devices in order to improve the quality of life. With the increase in the devices used in an application for smooth and efficient operations, the amount of data generated is high. Today, fog computing has been emerging as an extended version of the cloud infrastructure that provides highly scalable services that are latency-aware to the end devices that are geographically distributed. By adding the fog layer to the cloud computing paradigm, Quality of Service (QoS) can be improved in delay-sensitive and in time-critical applications. Owing to the increase in deploying fog networks on a large scale, the efficiency of energy can become a very important issue in the paradigm of fog computing. This can bring down service costs and further protect the environment. There has been plenty of research that was conducted for reducing consumption of energy in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) and fog computing, primarily focusing on the optimization techniques. This was to enhance energy conservation. In this work, a new and novel hybrid optimization technique based on TABU Search (TS), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and River Formation Dynamics (RFD) algorithms were proposed. The Hybrid RFD-TS, along with a hybrid RFD-PSO technique, was in the solution space search used for the local optimum, which is avoided. The experimental results demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed met.
Received 28/12/2023
Revised 22/04/2024
Accepted 24/04/2024
Published 25/05/2024
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Vambe W T, Chang C, Sibanda, K. A review of quality of service in fog computing for the Internet of Things. Int J Fog Comput. 2020; 3(1): 22-40. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFC.2020010102.
Muzammil Hussain Shahid, Ahmad Raza Hameed, Saif ul Islam, Hasan Ali Khattak, Ikram Ud Din, Joel J P C. Rodrigues. Energy and delay efficient fog computing using caching mechanism. Comput Commun. 2020; 154: 534-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.03.001.
Narayana P, Parvataneni P, Keerthi K. A Research on Various Scheduling Strategies in Fog Computing Environment. International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (IC-ETITE). 2020; 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ic-ETITE47903.2020.
Matrouk K, Alatoun K. Scheduling Algorithms in Fog Computing: A Survey. Int J Netw. 2021; 9(1): 59-74. . https://doi.org/10.2991/ijndc.k.210111.001
Rizk, R, Alkady, Y. Two-phase hybrid cryptography algorithm for wireless sensor networks. J electr syst inf technol. 2015; 2(3): 296-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesit.2015.11.005.
Tropea M, Spina MG, De Rango F, Gentile AF. Security in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Cryptography Performance Analysis at MAC Layer. Future Internet. 2022; 14(5): 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14050145 .
Hung C W, Hsu W T. Power consumption and calculation requirement analysis of AES for WSN IoT. Sensors. 2018; 18(6): 1675. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061675 .
Prajapati VK., Jain M., Chouhan L. Tabu search algorithm (TSA): A comprehensive survey. 3rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Computer Engineering: Machine Learning and Internet of Things (ICETCE). 2020: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETCE48199.2020.9091743
Aburukba RO, AliKarrar M, Landolsi T, et al. Scheduling Internet of Things requests to minimize latency in hybrid Fog–Cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2020; 111: 539-51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.09.039.
Dar and Ravindran Daks. Fog Computing Resource Optimization: A Review on Current Scenarios and Resource Management. Baghdad Sci J. 2019; 16(2): 0419. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2019.16.2.0419 .
Tellez, N., Jimeno, M., Salazar, A., Nino-Ruiz, E.D. A tabu search method for load balancing in fog computing. Int J Artif. 2018; 16(2): 78-105.
Mostafa Ghobaei-Arani, Alireza Souri, Fatemeh Safara, Monire Norouzi. An efficient task scheduling approach using moth‐flame optimization algorithm for cyber‐physical system applications in fog computing. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol. 2020; 31(2): e3770.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ett.3770.
Kumar J, Saxena V. Cloud Data Security through BB84 Protocol and Genetic Algorithm. Baghdad Sci. J.2022; 19(6(Suppl.): 1445. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2022.7281.
Ren X, Zhang Z, Arefzadeh SM. An energy‐aware approach for resource managing in the fog‐based Internet of Things using a hybrid algorithm. Int J Commun Syst. 2021; 34(1): e4652. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4652.
Yifan Hu, Keyong Hu, Hailin Liu, Xuexiao Wan. energy-balanced head nodes selection scheme for underwater mobile sensor networks. J Wirel Commun Netw. 2022;1.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-022-02141-3.
Mengjia Zeng, Xu Huang, Bo Zheng, Xiangxiang Fan. A Heterogeneous Energy Wireless Sensor Network Clustering Protocol. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2019; 2019, Article ID 7367281. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7367281.
Orojloo H, Haghighat AT. A Tabu search based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw. 2016; 22(5): 1711-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1060-7.
Jyotika Pruthi, Shaveta Arora, Kavita Khanna.2022. Brain tumor segmentation using river formation dynamics and active contour model in magnetic resonance images. Neural Comput Appl. 2022; 34(14): 11807–11816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07070-2
Vijayalakshmi K, Anandan P. A multi objective Tabu particle swarm optimization for effective cluster head selection in WSN. Clust Comput. 2019; 22(5): 12275-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1608-7.
Jyotika Pruthi, Shaveta Arora, Kavita Khanna. Brain tumor segmentation using river formation dynamics and active contour model in magnetic resonance images. Neural Comput Appl. 2022; 34(14): 11807–11816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07070-2.
Redlarski G, Dabkowski M, Palkowski A. Generating optimal paths in dynamic environments using River Formation Dynamics algorithm. J Comput. 2017; 20: 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.03.002.