Using Glass Waste to Prepare a Type of Bioceramic

Authors

  • Abdulrazzaq Hammal Department of Basic Sciences, College of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-1376
  • Nawzat Nabgali Department of Basic Sciences, College of Civil Engineering, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2024.11088

Keywords:

Biodegradation, Bio-glass, glass waste, Medical Ceramic, Silica

Abstract

Promoting sustainable living in the future involves efficiently managing waste to reclaim resources and convert them into new raw materials. There is a global focus on accelerating the utilization and recycling of waste to create valuable biomaterials, driving significant research efforts in this area. In this research, pure silica was isolated from glass waste and used in the manufacture of a type of bioceramic for medical applications. Several sequential stages were followed, starting with collecting samples of crushed glass and treating them physically (grinding, granular sorting), mixing the ground glass with NaOH in the following proportions (1:1), (2:1), and (3:1), then heat treatment was carried out at different temperatures (1000–900–800) ˚C, then the silica was isolated by treating the sample with HCl solution, followed by heat treatment at 900 degrees to obtain SiO2 with a yield of 68% and purity reaching 99.4%. Isolated pure silica was used to prepare standard bioglass 45S5. Specifications of prepared bioglass were determined using XRD, IR, and DTA, then the bioglass was converted into bioceramic through heat treatment according to DTA to ultimately obtain a product whose properties, composition, and susceptibility to biodegradation were studied. Results indicate that it was usable in medical applications.

References

Silver IA, Deas J, Erecińska M. Interactions of bioactive glasses with osteoblasts in vitro: effects of 45S5 Bioglass®, and 58S and 77S bioactive glasses on metabolism, intracellular ion concentrations and cell viability. Biomaterials. 2001 Jan; 22(2): 175–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00173-3. PMID: 11101161.

Negut I, Ristoscu C. Bioactive Glasses for Soft and Hard Tissue Healing Applications—A Short Review. Appl Sci (Basel). 2023 May 17;13(10):6151–1. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106151 .

Miguez-Pacheco V, Hench LL, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glasses beyond bone and teeth: Emerging applications in contact with soft tissues .Acta Biomater. 2015; 13: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.004 .

Mubina MSK, Shailajha S, Sankaranarayanan R, Smily ST. Enriched biological and mechanical properties of boron doped SiO2-CaO-Na2O-P2O5 bioactive glass ceramics (BGC). J Non Cryst Solids 2021 Oct; 570(53): 121007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.121007

Shan Z, Zhang Y, Liu S, Tao H, Yue Y. Mixed-alkali effect on hardness and indentation-loading behavior of a borate glass system. J Non Cryst Solids. 2020 Nov 1; 548: 120314–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120314

Crovace MC, Soares VO, Rodrigues ACM, Peitl O, Raucci LMSC, de Oliveira PT, et al. Understanding the mixed alkali effect on the sinterability and in vitro performance of bioactive glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2021 Jul; 41(7): 4391–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.020

Dimitriadis K, Tulyaganov DU, Vasilopoulos KC, Karakassides MA, Agathopoulos S. Influence of K and Mg substitutions on the synthesis and the properties of CaO-MgO-SiO2/Na2O, P2O5, CaF2 bioactive glasses. J Non Cryst Solids. 2021 Dec; 573: 121140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.121140

Wetzel R, Blochberger M, Scheffler F, Hupa L, Brauer DS. Mg or Zn for Ca substitution improves the sintering of bioglass 45S5. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 29; 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72091-7

Lefebvre L, Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Zenati R, Thollet G, Bernache-Assolant D, et al. Structural transformations of bioactive glass 45S5 with thermal treatments. Materialia (Oxf). 2007 Jun; 55(10): 3305–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.029

Abbasi M, Hashemi B. Fabrication and characterization of bioactive glass-ceramic using soda–lime–silica waste glass. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol App. 2014 Apr; 37: 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.031

Satyendra K S, Kumar J, Singh P, Rajput SK, Ashutosh K D, Ram P, et al. Impact of 13-93 bio-glass inclusion on the machinability, in-vitro degradation, and biological behavior of Y-TZP-based bioceramic composite. Ceram Int. 2024 Jan 1; 50(1): 1087–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.203

Abbasi M, Hashemi B. Fabrication and characterization of bioactive glass-ceramic using soda–lime–silica waste glass. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol App. 2014 Apr; 37: 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.031

Srinath P, Venugopal R, Patel S, Abdul Azeem P. A cost effective SiO2–CaO–Na2O bio-glass derived from bio-waste resources for biomedical applications. Prog Biomater. 2020 Nov 19 [cited 2023 Sep 11]; 9(4): 239–48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs40204-020-00145-0.

Sobh .H, Mihsen.H. Synthesis of Functionalized Silica from Rice Husks Containing C-I End Group. Baghdad Sci J. 2019 Dec 1; 16(4): 0886. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2019.16.4.0886

M Abd Dleam, E., & Kareem, S. H. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as a System for Ciprofloxacin Drug Delivery; Kinetic of Adsorption and Releasing. Baghdad Sci J. 2021 Jan 13; 18(2). https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2021.18.2.0357

Battaglia C, Cuevas A, De Wolf S. High-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells: status and perspectives. Energy Environ Sci. 2016; 9(5): 1552–76. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE03380B

Yadav S, Singh P, Pyare R. Synthesis, characterization, mechanical and biological properties of biocomposite based on zirconia containing 1393 bioactive glass with hydroxyapatite. Ceram Int. 2020 Jun; 46(8): 10442–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.043

Karpukhina N, Hill RG, Law RV. Crystallisation in oxide glasses – a tutorial review. Chem Soc Rev. 2014; 43(7): 2174–86. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60305A

Pei F, Zhu G, Li P, Guo H, Yang P. Effects of CaF2 on the sintering and crystallisation of CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 glass-ceramics. Ceram Int. 2020; 46(11): 17825–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.089

Chatzistavrou X, ZorbaT., Kontonasaki E, Chrissafis K., Koidis P,Paraskevopoulos K M. Following bioactive glass behaviour beyond melting temperature by thermal and optical methods. Phys Stat Sol. (a). 2004; 201: 944–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200306776

Labbaf S, Tsigkou O, Müller KH, Stevens MM, Porter AE, Jones JR. Spherical bioactive glass particles and their interaction with human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Biomaterials. 2011 Feb; 32(4): 1010–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.082

Galow AM, Rebl A, Koczan D, Bonk SM, Baumann W, Gimsa J. Increased osteoblast viability at alkaline pH in vitro provides a new perspective on bone regeneration. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2017 Feb 27 [cited 2022 Mar 24]; 10: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.02.001

Downloads

Issue

Section

article

How to Cite

1.
Using Glass Waste to Prepare a Type of Bioceramic. Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. [cited 2024 Oct. 9];22(4). Available from: https://bsj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/BSJ/article/view/11088