Performance Evaluation of Mobility Models over UDP Traffic Pattern for MANET Using NS-2
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The current study presents the simulative study and evaluation of MANET mobility models over UDP traffic pattern to determine the effects of this traffic pattern on mobility models in MANET which is implemented in NS-2.35 according to various performance metri (Throughput, AED (Average End-2-end Delay), drop packets, NRL (Normalize Routing Load) and PDF (Packet Delivery Fraction)) with various parameters such as different velocities, different environment areas, different number of nodes, different traffic rates, different traffic sources, different pause times and different simulation times . A routing protocol.…was exploited AODV(Adhoc On demand Distance Vector) and RWP (Random Waypoint), GMM (Gauss Markov Model), RPGM (Reference Point Group Model) and MGM (Manhattan Grid Model) mobility models above CBR traffic sources. The results of Reference Point Group Model simulation illuminate that routing protocol performance is best with RPG mobility model than other models.
Received 30/3/2019, Accepted 26/2/2020, Published Online First 6/12/2020
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
An N, Tang L, Zhu Y, Kou Z, Chen X, Duan Z. Research of Different Mobility Models on Routing Protocol Performance of Ad Hoc Networks. In Advanced Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 2016 (pp. 165-173). Springer, Singapore..
Ako M A, Emre O, Husnu B. Investigating the Impact of Mobility Models on MANET Routing Protocols. Ijacsa. 2019; 10(2).
Toyota H, Inoue S, Kakuda Y. A Proposal and Evaluation of Mobility Model Which Derives Various Node Mobility Scenarios. In2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) 2018 Oct 8 (pp. 1623-1627). IEEE.
Manoharan R, Ilavarasan E. Impact of mobility on the performance of multicast routing protocols in MANET. arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.1742. 2010 May 11.
Garg A, Kumar A, Chaturvedi AK. Analysing the Effects of Mobility Model on QoS in MANET. IJCA. December 2017; 975:8887, 180 (2).
Dhamanskar PM, Giri DN. Performance evaluation of On Demand MANET protocols for different mobility models. Int. J. Emerging Technol. Adv. Eng. 2012 Sep:2250-459.
Shoaib M, Minallah N, Shah S, Rizwan S, Hussain H. Investigating the impact of group mobility models over the on-demand routing protocol in MANETs. In Eighth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM 2013) 2013 Sep 10 (pp. 29-34). IEEE.
Camp T, Boleng J, Davies V. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. WIREL COMMUN MOB COM. 2002 Aug;2(5):483-502.
Amjad K, Stocker AJ. Impact of node density and mobility on the performance of AODV and DSR in MANETS. In2010 7th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks & Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP 2010) 2010 Jul 21 (pp. 61-65). IEEE.
Toyota H, Inoue S, Kakuda Y. A Proposal and Evaluation of Mobility Model Which Derives Various Node Mobility Scenarios. In2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) 2018 Oct 8 (pp. 1623-1627). IEEE.
Singh SK, Duvvuru R, Singh JP. Performance impact of TCP and UDP on the Mobility Models and Routing Protocols in MANET. InIntelligent Computing, Networking, and Informatics 2014 (pp. 895-901). Springer, New Delhi.
Bugarčić PD, Malnar MZ, Jevtić NJ. Performance Analysis of MANET Networks Based on AODV Protocol in NS-3 Simulator. In2018 26th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR) 2018 Nov 20 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.Rangaraj J, Anitha M. Performance analysis of proactive and reactive protocol under different mobility models for MANET. In2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC) 2017 Feb 10 (pp. 637-643). IEEE.
Qin Y, Li L, Zhong X, Yang Y, Gwee CL. A cross-layer QoS design with energy and traffic balance aware for different types of traffic in MANETs. Wireless Personal Communications., 2015 Dec 1;85(3):1429-49.
Das M, Sahu B, Bhanja U. Mobility and its Effect on the Performance of MANET. In2015 IEEE Power, Communication and Information Technology Conference (PCITC) 2015 Oct 15 (pp. 871-877). IEEE.
Gerharz M, de Waal C. BonnMotion-a mobility scenario generation tool. University of Bonn,[Online]. accessible: www. cs. uni-bonn. de/IV/BonnMotion.
Rangaraj J, Anitha M. Performance analysis of proactive and reactive protocol under different mobility models for MANET. In2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC) 2017 Feb 10 (pp. 637-643). IEEE.