A Comparison Between the Theoretical Cross Section Based on the Partial Level Density Formulae Calculated by the Exciton Model with the Experimental Data for (_79^197)Au nucleus

Main Article Content

Athraa Abdullah
Ali D Salloum

Abstract

In this paper, the theoretical cross section in pre-equilibrium nuclear reaction has been studied for the reaction  at energy 22.4 MeV. Ericson’s formula of partial level density PLD and their corrections (William’s correction and spin correction) have been substituted  in the theoretical cross section and compared with the experimental data for  nucleus. It has been found that the theoretical cross section with one-component PLD from Ericson’s formula when  doesn’t agree with the experimental value and when . There is little agreement only at the high value of energy range with  the experimental cross section. The theoretical cross section that depends on the one-component William's formula and on-component corrected to spin PLD formula doesn't agree with the experimental cross section. But in case of theoretical cross section based on two-component Ericson's and William's PLD formulae it has been found that there is acceptable agreement when the exciton number is taken .


 

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
A Comparison Between the Theoretical Cross Section Based on the Partial Level Density Formulae Calculated by the Exciton Model with the Experimental Data for (_79^197)Au nucleus. Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 10 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];18(1):0139. Available from: https://bsj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/BSJ/article/view/4682
Section
article

How to Cite

1.
A Comparison Between the Theoretical Cross Section Based on the Partial Level Density Formulae Calculated by the Exciton Model with the Experimental Data for (_79^197)Au nucleus. Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 10 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];18(1):0139. Available from: https://bsj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/BSJ/article/view/4682

References

Betak E, Hodson, P E. Particle -hole state densities in pre-equilibrium nuclear reaction models. Rep. prog. Phys. 1998; 61:483-524

Sharma MK, Bhardwaj HD, Singh Bp, parasd R .A study of pre-equilibrium emission of neutrons in (_41^93)Nb (α,xn) reactions. Eur phys J. 2007; A31, 43-51.

Tatar.A, Tel E. Investigation of proton Emission spectral of some Nuclear Reactor Materials for (p,px) Reactions. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi. 2010 Jun; 5(2):211-215.

Noori SS, karpuz N, Akkurt I. excitation functions of (d,n) reactions on some light nuclei. Acta Physica Polonica A .2016; 130 (1): 484-486.

Korkmaz ME,Yigit M , Agar O. Exitation function of neutron induced nuclear reactions for (_27^59)Co nucleus using different level density models. Acta Physica Polonica A. 2017; 132 (3):670-673.

Alattabi HD, Shafik SS, Kadhim MA. Secondary Emission Effect on SomePre-Equilibrium Nuclear Reactions Spectra at Different Energies. IJS. 2019 Apr 18:34-9.

Ahamed RS, The inverse reaction cross sections for some charged particles using the optical model parameter. World Scientific News.2016; 28:113-124.

Selman AA, Jasim HS, Nuclear level density calculation of astrophysical reactions. J Appl phys. 2016; 8(4):

Ozdogan H, Sekerci M, Capali V,Kaplan A . Cross-section calculations of (γ,xn) reactions for(_79^197)Au . CSJ. 2012; 37:S208-S.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.