Using of Index Biological Integrity of Phytoplankton (P-IBI) in the Assessment of Water Quality in Don River Section

Main Article Content

E.N Bakaeva
Murooj Abbas Buhlool Al-Ghizzi
Zahraa Aljanabi


       The multimetric Phytoplankton Index of Biological Integrity (P-IBI) was applied throughout Rostov on Don city (Russia) on 8 Locations in Don River from April – October 2019. The P-IBI is composed from seven metrics: Species Richness Index (SRI), Density of Phytoplankton and total biomass of phytoplankton and Relative Abundance (RA) for blue-green Algae, Green Algae, Bacillariophyceae and Euglenaphyceae Algae. The average P-IBI values fell within the range of (45.09-52.4). Therefore, water throughout the entire study area was characterized by the equally "poor" quality. Negative points of anthropogenic impact detected at the stations are: Above the city of Rostov-on-Don (1 km, higher duct Aksai) was 38.57 in June, the lower inflow of the Temernik river  which was 38.57- 41.42 in summer and below the spillway was 38.57 -34.28 in August. At these stations, samples with P-IBI values more than 56, characterizing water quality as "Fair", were not found in any of the observations. The negative effect on the water at the stations may be due to the influence of the closely located Aksai city and the impact of the Temernik River. In Russia P-IBI have not been used yet, so this study can be considered as the first study that’s conducted to assess the environmental status of the Don River by using the phytoplankton index of Biological Integrity and has developed scoring criteria of the Don River (P-IBI) and other watercourses of the south of Russia. The continuous monitoring relaying on the selection of the most suitable metrics score is recommended.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bakaeva E, Al-Ghizzi MAB, Aljanabi Z. Using of Index Biological Integrity of Phytoplankton (P-IBI) in the Assessment of Water Quality in Don River Section . Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. [cited 2021Jan.20];18(1):0087. Available from:


Li TY, Li SY, Liang C, Bush RT, Xiong LH., Jiang YJ. A comparative assessment of Australia's Lower Lakes water quality under extreme drought and post-drought conditions using multivariate statistical techniques. J. Clean. Prod. 2018. 190, pp. 1-11.

Yearbook. Surface water quality of the Russian Federation. St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 2017.556 s.

Voulvoulis N, Arpon KD, Giakoumis T. The EU Water Framework Directive:from great expectations to problems with implementation. Sci. Total Environ. 2017. 575,358–366.

Bakaeva EN, Nikanorov AM, Ignatova NA, Chernikova GG. Ecological and toxicological situation of the Tsimlyansk reservoir in the modern period // All-Russian scientific conference "Water and water resources: system-forming functions in nature and the economy" (Tsimlyansk, July 23–28, 2012). Novocherkassk: SRSTU (NPI), S. 2012. 151-157.

Monaghan KA. Four reasons to question the accuracy of a biotic index, the risk of metric bias and the scope to improve accuracy. PLoS One 2016. 11, 7e.

Brown ED, Williams BK. Ecological integrity assessment as a metric of biodiversity: are we measuring what we say we are? Biodivers. Conserv. 2016. 25, 1011–1035.

Zachary C, Johnson a, Scott G, Leibowitz b, Ryan A. Hill. Revising the index of watershed integrity national maps. 2019. 651, 2615–2630.

Scown MW, Flotemersch, JE, Spanbauer TL, Eason T, Garmestani A, Chaffin BC . People and water: exploring the social-ecological condition of watersheds of the United States. Elementa (Wash. D.C.) 2017. 5, 64.

Karr JR. " Biological integrity: along–neglected aspect of water resource management". Ecological Applications, 1991.Vol.1,No.1,pp.66-84. doi: 10.2307/1941848

Kane DD." The Development of Planktonic Index of Biotic Integrity for Lake Erie", Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University. 2004. 277p.

O'Brien A, Townsend K, Hale R, Sharley D, Pettigrove V. How is ecosystem health defined and measured? a critical review of freshwater and estuarine studies. Ecol. Ind. 2016. 69, 722–729.

Zhaoshi W, Kuanyi L. Index of biotic integrity based on phytoplankton and water quality index: Do they have a similar pattern on water quality assessment? A study of rivers in Lake Taihu Basin, China. 2019. Vol.658, pp.395-404.

Claire HD et al. A database of marine phytoplankton abundance, biomass and species composition in Australian waters. SCIENTIFIC DATA | 3:160043 | DOI: 10.1038/sdata. 2016.43

Cai W, Xia J, Yang M, Wang W, Dou C, Zeng Z, Dong S, Sheng L. Cross-basin analysis of freshwater ecosystem health based on a zooplankton based Index of Biotic Integrity: Models and application. Ecol. Indic., 2020.vol. 114, p. 106333.

Souza GBG, Vianna M. Fish-based indices for assessing ecological quality and biotic integrity in transitional waters: A systematic review. Ecol. Indic., 2020. Vol 109 , p 105665.

Lurie PM, Panov VD. Ecological and geographical problems of the south of Russia. Rostov-on-Don. Publishing house "Hephaestus". 1999. 256s.

Yearbook of surface water quality according to hydrobiological indicators in the territory of the North Caucasus UGKS in 1987 (Lower Don). Rostov-on-Don 1988. Ex. N. 1.

Sournia A. Phytoplankton manual. In “Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology 6” UNESCO, Paris. 1978. pp. 337.

Dedusenko-Schegoleva NT, Matvienko AM, Shkorbatov LA. Green algae. Key to Freshwater Algae of the USSR. 1959, Issue 8.

Germain H. Flore Des Diatomées, Diatomophycées. Société Nouvelle Des Éditions Boubée, Paris. 1981.

Gollerbach MM, Kosinskaya EK, Polyansky VI . Blue-green algae. Key to Freshwater Algae of the USSR. 1953, Issue 2.

Popova TG. Euglenae algae. Determinant of Freshwater algae of the USSR, 1955, Issue 7.

Prescott GW. Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. William C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque. 1982.

Zabelina MM, Kiselev IA . Proshkina-Lavrenko A.I., Sheshukova V.S.. Diatoms. Key to Freshwater Algae of the USSR, 1951, Issue 4.

Astin LE. Developing Biological Indicators from Diverse Data: the Potomac Basin-Wild index ofBenthic Integrity (B-IPI). Ecol. Indic., 2007. 7(4): 895-908.

Yearbook of surface water quality according to hydrobiological indicators in the territory of the North Caucasus UGKS in 1985 (Lower Don). Rostov-on-Don 1986. Ex. N. 1.

Yearbook of surface water quality according to hydrobiological indicators in the territory of the North Caucasus UGKS in 1986 (Lower Don). Rostov-on-Don 1987. Ex. N. 1.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment (MAIA) State of the Flowing Waters Report. EPA/620/R-06/001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development Washington, 2006. DC 20460.

Maulood BK, Alobaidy AHMJ, Alsaboonchi A, Abid HS, Alobaidy GS. PhytoplanktonIndex of Biological Integrity (P-IBI) in Several Marshes, Southern IRAQ. J. of Environ. Protection, 2011. 2(4): 387-394.

McCormick FH, Hughes RH, Kaufmann PR, Peck DV, Stoddard JL, Herlihy AT. Development index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands Region. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.. 2001. Vol.130, pp. 857-877.

Song WW, Xu Q, Fu XQ, Zhang P, Pang Y, Song DH. Research on the relationship between water diversion and water quality of Xuanwu Lake, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. He. 2018. 15.

Hassan FM.1993. Alimnological study on Hilla river. Al-Mustansiriya J. Sci, 8,pp.22-30.

Wu P, Qin BQ, Yu G, Deng JM, Zhou J. Effects of nutrient on algae biomass during summer and winter in inflow rivers of Taihu Basin, China. Water Environ. Res. 2016. 88,665–672.

Katsiapi M, Mousta-Gouni M, Sommer U. Assessing ecological water quality of freshwaters: PhyCol- a new phytoplankton community Index, Ecol Inform., 2016 .Vol. 31, pp. 22-29.

Deppeler SL, Davidson AT. Southern Ocean phytoplankton in a changing climate. Front Mar Sci. 2017. 4:40.

GD 52.24.309. Organization and conduct of regime monitoring of the condition and pollution of surface land waters/. Rostov-on-Don: Roshydromet, Hydrochemical Institute. 2016. 99 p.