Inhibition of Biofilm Formation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens by Cell-Free Supernatants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Analyzed by GC-MS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2023.8692Keywords:
Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Biofilms, GC-MS, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 16S rRNA gene sequencingAbstract
One of the most economically significant plant pathogenic bacteria is Agrobacterium tumefaciens, infects plants by exploiting biofilms it forms on their surfaces wounds. This article has been concerned with the need for new antibacterial agents due to the limitations of current treatments. The capacity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-free supernatant to inhibit the A. tumefaciens-produced biofilms as well as its chemical makeup were examined in this work. Using the API 20E kit and polymerase chain reaction of the 16S rRNA gene, P. aeruginosa was isolated from the soil and identified. It displayed a 93% identity with the common bacterium Pseudomonas sp.SeaQual P_B_845W, MT626817.1 in the GenBank. Using the microdilution method, the ability of the lyophilized supernatant was then determined at nine concentrations (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50%) of biofilm formation. The results revealed an inhibitory effect as percentages of 66, 61, 51, 27, 20, 17, and 15%,. After being injected with the GC-MC device, it was found that it consisted of 30 chemical compounds, which were identified by their names as;(Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-, Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester, Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(2-methyl propyl)-, 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester, and cis-13-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester), this demonstrates that its (154, 270, 210, 296, 296, 298) Daltons and (9.38, 19.12, 6.8, 4.45, 8.33, 5.90)% of the total space. The discovery that P. aeruginosa cell-free supernatants include chemical compounds for the first time and have an inhibitory influence to produce biofilms by A. tumefaciens is the study's most significant finding.
Received 07/03/2023
Revised 11/08/2023
Accepted 13/08/2023
Published Online First 25/12/2023
References
Vestby LK, Grønseth T, Simm R, Nesse LL. Bacterial biofilm and its role in the pathogenesis of disease. Antibiotics. 2020 Feb 3; 9(2):59. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fantibiotics9020059.
Di Martino P. Extracellular polymeric substances, a key element in understanding biofilm phenotype. AIMS Microbiology. 2018; 4(2):274-288. https://doi.org/10.3934%2Fmicrobiol.2018.2.274.
Ajijah N, Fiodor A, Pandey AK, Rana A, Pranaw K. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) with Biofilm-Forming Ability: A Multifaceted Agent for Sustainable Agriculture. Diversity. 2023 Jan; 15(1): 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010112.
Meyer T, Renoud S, Vigouroux A, Miomandre A, Gaillard V, Kerzaon I, et al. Regulation of hydroxycinnamic acid degradation drives Agrobacterium fabrum lifestyles. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2018 Aug 13; 31(8): 814–822. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-10-17-0236-R.
Slater SC, Goldman BS, Goodner B, Setubal JC, Farrand SK, Nester EW, et al. Genome sequences of three Agrobacterium biovars help elucidate the evolution of multichromosome genomes in bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2009 Apr 15; 191(8): 2501–2511. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01779-08.
Heindl JE, Wang Y, Heckel BC, Mohari B. Mechanisms and regulation of surface interactions and biofilm formation in Agrobacterium. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00176.
Ahmed B, Jailani A, Lee JH, Lee J. Inhibition of growth, biofilm formation, virulence, and surface attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by cinnamaldehyde derivatives. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 1001865. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1001865.
Shreni Agrawal ER. A Review: Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation to increase plant productivity. J Phytopharm. 2022; 11: 111-117. https://doi.org/10.31254/phyto.2022.11211.
Tiwari M, Mishra AK, Chakrabarty D. Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer: recent advancements and layered immunity in plants. Planta. 2022 Jul 1; 256(2): 37. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00425-022-03951-x.
Asande LK, Omwoyo RO, Oduor RO, Nyaboga EN. A simple and fast Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system for passion fruit KPF4 (Passiflora edulis f. edulis× Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa). Plant Methods. 2020 Dec; 16: 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00684-4
Miller SA, Ferreira JP, LeJeune JT. Antimicrobial use and resistance in plant agriculture: a one health perspective. Agriculture. 2022 Feb 17; 12(2): 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020289.
Weir RT, Dalzell JJ. Agrobacterium: Soil Microbe, Plant Pathogen, and Natural Genetic Engineer. Front Young Minds. 2020 May; 8: 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.12020.00064.
Kerr A, Bullard G. Biocontrol of crown gall by Rhizobium rhizogenes: challenges in biopesticide commercialisation. Agronomy. 2020; 10(8): 1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081126.
Kahla Y, Zouari-Bouassida K, Rezgui F, Trigui M. Efficacy of Eucalyptus cinerea as a source of bioactive compounds for curative biocontrol of crown gall caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain B6. BioMed Res Int. 2017 Jul; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9308063.
Lee JE, Jung M, Lee SC, Huh MJ. Antibacterial mode of action of trans-cinnamaldehyde derived from cinnamon bark (Cinnamomum verum) essential oil against Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Pestic Biochem Phys. 2020 May 1; 165: 104546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.02.012.
Jailani A, Ahmed B, Lee JH, Lee J. Inhibition of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Growth and Biofilm Formation by Tannic Acid. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(7): 1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071619.
Alexpandi R, Ponraj JG, Swasthikka RP, Abirami G. Anti-QS mediated anti-infection efficacy of probiotic culture-supernatant against Vibrio campbellii infection and the identification of active compounds through in vitro and in silico analyses. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2021 Aug 1; 35: 102108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102108.
de Araujo LV, Guimarães CR, da Silva Marquita RL, Santiago VM, de Souza MP, Nitschke M, et al. Rhamnolipid and surfactin: Anti-adhesion/antibiofilm and antimicrobial effects. Food Control. 2016 May 1; 63: 171-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.11.036.
Ahmed IA, Aljondi AI, Alabed AA, Al-Mahdi AY. Isolation, screening and antibiotic sensitivity of Pseudomonas species from Kelana Jaya lake soil in Selangor Malaysia. Baghdad Sci J. 2021 Sep 1; 18(3): 0455. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2021.18.3.0455.
Ghadamgahi F, Tarighi S, Taheri P, Saripella GV, Anzalone A, Kalyandurg PB, et al. Plant growth-promoting activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa FG106 and its ability to act as a biocontrol agent against potato, tomato and taro pathogens. Biology. 2022 Jan 14; 11(1): 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010140.
Minuț M, Diaconu M, Roșca M, Cozma P. Screening of Azotobacter, Bacillus and Pseudomonas Species as Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Process. 2023 Jan; 11(1): 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010080.
Diaconu M, Pavel LV, Hlihor RM, Rosca M, Fertu DI, Lenz M, et al. Characterization of heavy metal toxicity in some plants and microorganisms—A preliminary approach for environmental bioremediation. N Biotechnol. 2020 May 25; 56: 130-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2020.01.003.
Saleem M, Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Shahid M. Impact of lead tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, physiology, antioxidant activities, yield and lead content in sunflower in lead contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2018 Mar 1; 195: 606-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.117.
Kuzina E, Mukhamatdyarova S, Sharipova Y, Makhmutov A. Influence of Bacteria of the Genus Pseudomonas on Leguminous Plants and Their Joint Application for Bioremediation of Oil Contaminated Soils. Plants. 2022 Jan; 11(23): 3396. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233396.
Wang HH, Ye KP, Zhang QQ, Dong Y. Biofilm formation of meat-borne Salmonella enterica and inhibition by the cell-free supernatant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Food Control. 2013; 32(2): 650-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.01.047.
Ramadhan F, Alfiko Y, Purwantomo S, Mubarok AF, Budinarta W, Suwanto A, et al. A New Approach for Controlling Agrobacterium tumefaciens Post Transformation Using Lytic Bacteriophage. Plants. 2022 Nov 16; 11(22): 3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223124.
Ali AA, Hameed KW, Nadder MI. Isolation Of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Soil and Production of Lipase Enzyme. IOP Conf Ser.: Earth Environ Sci. 2022; 961(1): 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/961/1/012087.
Shaebth LJ. Molecular identification and sequencing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes among different isolates in Al-Diwaneyah hospital. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2018; 32(2): 183-8. https://doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2019.153847.
Edwards U, Rogall T, Blöcker H, Emde M. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Oct 11; 17(19): 7843-53, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.19.7843.
El-Mokhtar MA, Hassanein KM, Ahmed AS, Gad GF. Antagonistic activities of cell-free supernatants of lactobacilli against extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Feb; 17: 543-52. https://doi.org/10.2147%2FIDR.S235603.
Sornsenee P, Chatatikun M, Mitsuwan W, Kongpol K, Kooltheat N, Sohbenalee S, et al. Lyophilized cell-free supernatants of Lactobacillus isolates exhibited antibiofilm, antioxidant, and reduces nitric oxide activity in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Peer J. 2021 Nov 30; 9: e12586. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.12586v0.1/reviews/1.
Gopal MA, Thirupathi A. Isolation and Identification Of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa From Uropathogens. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020; 7(11): 9235-9244.
Yang KM, Kim JS, Kim HS, Kim YY, Oh JK, Jung HW, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri AN417 cell-free culture supernatant as a novel antibacterial agent targeting oral pathogenic bacteria. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15; 11(1): 1631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80921-x.
Al-Rubyee SS, Al-Barhawi NI. Antibacterial effect of Bacillus subtilis extract on the growth of pathogenic bacteria and analyzed by GC-MS. J Educ Sci. 2022 March 31; 31(1): 111-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.33899/edusj.2022.132296.1203.
Altaai ME, Aziz IH, Marhoon AA. Identification Pseudomonas aeruginosa by 16S rRNA gene for Differentiation from other Pseudomonas Species that isolated from Patients and Environment. Baghdad Sci J. 2014; 11(2): 1028-1034, https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2014.11.2.1028-1034.
Mohamed MS, Abd Alfadil NA, Gibril SI, Elsaman T. Identification and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in paper currency notes. Pharmacol Online. 2020 Dec 30; 3: 142-150,
Xiang W, Wei X, Tang H, Li L. Complete genome sequence and biodegradation characteristics of benzoic acid-degrading bacterium Pseudomonas sp. SCB32. BioMed Res Int. 2020 Jul 2; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6146104.
Eremwanarue OA, Nwawuba SU, Shittu OH. Characterisation of the prevailing multidrug Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from surgical wound using 16S rRNA sequencing technique. Malays J Med Sci. 2021;28(4):37-49. https://doi.org/10.21315%2Fmjms2021.28.4.5.
An D, Danhorn T, Fuqua C, Parsek MR. Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006 Mar 7; 103(10): 3828-33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511323103.
Hibbing ME, Fuqua C. Inhibition and dispersal of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biofilms by a small diffusible Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoproduct (s). Arch Microbiol. 2012 Jun; 194: 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00203-011-0767-9.
Zamani H, Rahbar S, Garakoui SR, Afsah SA. Antibiofilm potential of Lactobacillus plantarum spp. cell free supernatant (CFS) against multidrug resistant bacterial pathogens. Pharm biomed Res. 2017 Aug 10; 10: 3(2): 39-44. http://pbr.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-167-en.html.
Qin S, Xiao W, Zhou C, Pu Q, Deng X, Lan L, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022; 7(1): 199. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41392-022-01056-1.
Domalaon R, Ammeter D, Brizuela M, Gorityala BK. (2019). Repurposed antimicrobial combination therapy: Tobramycin-ciprofloxacin hybrid augments activity of the anticancer drug mitomycin C against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul; 10: 1556-1565. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffmicb.2019.01556.
Khan J, Tarar SM, Gul I, Nawaz U. Challenges of antibiotic resistance biofilms and potential combating strategies: a review. 3 Biotech. 2021Apr ; 11: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs13205-021-02707-w.
Pouget C, Pantel A, Dunyach-Remy C, Magnan C, et al. Antimicrobial activity of antibiotics on biofilm formed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an open microfluidic model mimicking the diabetic foot environment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Dec 28; 78(2): 540-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac438.
Shen T, Chen L, Liu Y, Shi S, Liu Z, Cai K, et al. Decanoic acid modification enhances the antibacterial activity of PMAP-23RI-Dec. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021 Feb 1; 157: 105609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105609
Florenly F, Novelya N, Janiar M, Miranda M. Nano-Green Betel Leaf Extracts (Piper betle L.) Inhibits the Growth of Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus. e-GiGi. 2022 Jun 6; 10(2):154-161. https://doi.org/10.35790/eg.v10i2.39014.
Zahara K, Bibi Y, Arshad M, Kaukab G. In-vitro examination and isolation of antidiarrheal compounds using five bacterial strains from invasive species Bidens bipinnata L. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 1; 29(1): 472-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.006.
Kiran GS, Priyadharsini S, Sajayan A, Ravindran A. An antibiotic agent pyrrolo [1, 2-a] pyrazine-1, 4-dione, hexahydro isolated from a marine bacteria Bacillus tequilensis MSI45 effectively controls multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. RSC Adv. 2018; 8(32): 17837-46. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA00820E
Rajivgandhi G, Vijayan R, Maruthupandy M, Vaseeharan B. Antibiofilm effect of Nocardiopsis sp. GRG 1 (KT235640) compound against biofilm forming Gram negative bacteria on UTIs. Microb Pathog. 2018 May 1; 118: 190-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.011.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Baghdad Science Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
