Zooplankton composition and structure in the Indus River Estuary, Sindh, Pakistan
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study abundance and composition of zooplanktons in the Indus River Estuary was conducted to examine habitat characteristics and its impact on tiny organisms. Overall 30,656 individuals were identified and segregated into seven major groups including Copepods, Cnidarians, Decapods, Mollusk, Pisces, Amphipods and Chaetognaths. For better understanding they were further divided into eighteen planktonic categories. Among them Lucifer spp. comprises of 52.21% was the most abundant group with a peak appeared in March whereas Chaetognaths were rarely observed in the entire study period. Species diversity exhibited a mixed trend with the highest values (0.776) of dominance observed in spring (March). The results of Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) indicate (60.2% and 39.79%) variability among first II axis. On this basis of the result it is obvious that water turbidity is trigger of the abundance and distribution whereas total dissolved solids (TDS) showed minimal influence deduced from CCA analysis.
Received 10/05/2023
Revised20/05/2023
Accepted 23/05/2023
Published 20/06/2023
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Sommer U, Lewandowska A. Climate change and the phytoplankton spring bloom: warming and overwintering zooplankton have similar effects on phytoplankton. Glob Chang Biol. 2011; 17(1): 154-62.
Wilson JG. The role of bio indicators in estuarine management. Estuaries. 1994; 17(1): 94-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352337
Uriarte I, Villate F. Differences in the abundance and distribution of copepods in two estuaries of the Basque coast (Bay of Biscay) in relation to pollution. J Plankton Res. 2005: 1; 27(9):863-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.01.003
Lloret J, Marín A, Marín-Guirao L. Is coastal lagoon eutrophication likely to be aggravated by global climate change? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2008; 78(2): 403-12.
Moreno M, Ferrero TJ, Gallizia I, Vezzulli L, Albertelli G, Fabiano M. An assessment of the spatial heterogeneity of environmental disturbance within an enclosed harbour through the analysis of meiofauna and nematode assemblages. EstuarCoast Shelf Sci. 2008 ; 77(4): 565-76.
Buskey EJ. Annual pattern of micro-and mesozooplankton abundance and biomass in a subtropical estuary. J Plankton Res. 1993;15(8): 907-24.
Leandro SM, Morgado F, Pereira F, Queiroga H. Temporal changes of abundance, biomass and production of copepod community in a shallow temperate estuary (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2007; 74(1-2): 215-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.009
Bashevkin SM, Hartman R, Thomas M, Barros A, Burdi CE, Hennessy A, et al. Five decades (1972–2020) of zooplankton monitoring in the upper San Francisco Estuary. PLoS ONE. 2022; 17(3): e0265402.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0265402
Ajeel SG, Abbas MF. Diversity, Abundance, and Distribution of Cladocera at the end of the Tigris River North of Basrah–IRAQ. Baghdad Sci J. 2019; 16(4): 854-64. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2019.16.4.0854
Sanvicente-Añorve L, Sánchez-Campos M, Alatorre-Mendieta M, Lemus-Santana E and Guerra-Castro E. Zooplankton functional traits in a tropical estuarine system: Are lower and upper estuaries functionally different?. Front Mar Sci. 2022; 9: 1004193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1004193
Panhwar SK, Mairaj M. An assessment of phytoplankton diversity in relation to the environmental variables in the Indus River Estuary, Sindh, Pakistan. Pakistan J Bot. 2022; 54 (4): https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2022-4(31)