Main Article Content
Scams remain among top cybercrime incidents happening around the world. Individuals with high susceptibility to persuasion are considered as risk-takers and prone to be scam victims. Unfortunately, limited number of research is done to investigate the relationship between appeal techniques and individuals' personality thus hindering a proper and effective campaigns that could help to raise awareness against scam. In this study, the impact of fear and rational appeal were examined as well as to identify suitable approach for individuals with high susceptibility to persuasion. To evaluate the approach, pretest and posttest surveys with 3 separate controlled laboratory experiments were conducted. This study found that rational appeal treatment has a significantly stronger impact than the fear appeal. This result is a starting point in suggesting that rational appeal is a promising means in persuading individuals with high susceptibility to persuasion.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Wong A. Malaysians on receiving end of world’s biggest percentage of scam calls, new data claims: Malaymail. 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/12/04/malaysia-has-worlds-biggest-percentage-of-scam-calls-new-data-claims/1815984
International Comparative Legal Guides. Cybersecurity Laws and Regulations 2020. United Kingdom:Global Legal Group. 2019. Retrieved from: https://iclg.com/practice-areas/cybersecurity-laws-and-regulations
New Straits Times. Cyber scams top the list every year. 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.nst.com.my /news/nation/2019/ 08/ 512452/cyber-scams-top-list-every-year
The Malaysian Reserve. Scammers looted RM410m up till August since last year. 2020. Retrieved from: https://themalaysianreserve.com/2019/10/30/scammers-looted-rm410m-up-till-august-since-last-year/
Norris G, Brookes A, Dowell D. The Psychology of Internet Fraud Victimisation: A Systematic Review. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 2019;34(3),231-245.
National Trading Standards (NTS). National Trading Standards — Scams Team Review. United Kingdom: RAND Corporation. 2016. Retrieved from: http://https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1510.html
Henderson R. The Science Behind Why People Follow the Crowd. Why do other people influence us so much? 2017. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/ 201705/ the-science-behind-why-people-follow-the-crowd
Samtani S, Zhu H, Yu S. Fear Appeals and Information Security Behaviors: An Empirical Study on Mechanical Turk. AIS Transactions on Replication Research. 2019;5,1-22.
Umber S, Ghouri M, Sultan K, Yousaf M. Dengue Campaign and the Youth Behavior: A Study of Fear Appeal Impacts. Global Media Journal: Pakistan Edition. 2016;9(1).
Daudé É, Mazumdar S, Solanki V. Widespread fear of dengue transmission but poor practices of dengue prevention: A study in the slums of Delhi, India. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(2),0171543.
Boshoff C, Toerien L. Subconscious responses to fear-appeal health warnings: An exploratory study of cigarette packaging. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences. 2017;20(1).
Simpson J. Appeal to fear in health care: appropriate or inappropriate? Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2017;25(1).
Carey R, Sarma K. Threat appeals in health communication: messages that elicit fear and enhance perceived efficacy positively impact on young male drivers. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1).
Grigaliunaite V, Pileliene L. Emotional or Rational? The Determination of the Influence of Advertising Appeal on Advertising Effectiveness. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business. 2016;63(3),391-414.
Sudbury-Riley L, Edgar L. Why Older Adults Show Preference for Rational Over Emotional Advertising Appeals: A U.K. Brand Study Challenges the Applicability of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory to Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research. 2016;56(4),441–455. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-2016-048
Kamran Q, Siddiqui DA. The Impact of Emotional Advertising on Consumer Buying Behavior for Home Appliance Products in Pakistan. Business and Management Horizons. 2019;7(1),23. https://doi.org/10.5296/bmh.v7i1.14410
Malik MS, Tanveer R. Effect of Rational Advertisement Appeal on Online Branding in Pakistan. International Journal of Industrial Marketing. 2018;3(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijim.v3i113635
Borborjafari M, Khorshid S, Rastegar A. Evaluating the Relationship of Rational Advertising Appeals, Cognitive Information Processing Styles of Consumers and Advertising Effectiveness. International Business Management. 2016;10(15). https://doi.org/10.36478/ibm.2016.2928.2934
Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Dictionary | English Dictionary, Translations & Thesaurus. 2019. Retrieved from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org
Pouryousefi S, Frooman J. The Consumer Scam: An Agency-Theoretic Approach. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017;154(1),1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3466-x
UK Finance. Fraud the Facts 2019. The Definitive Overview of Payment Industry Fraud (4). 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/policy-and-guidance/reports-publications/fraud-facts-2019
Aiman A. RM83mil lost to a “love scammers” so far this year. Free Malaysia Today. 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2018/09/13/rm83mil-lost-to-love-scammers-so-far-this-year
Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), Republic of Namibia. Advance Fee Fraud Schemes. 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.fic.na/uploads/Public_Awareness/Forewarning_Reports/Advance%20Fee%20Fraud%20Schemes.pdf
Borja ME, Brown ER. Covering New Fraud Risks with Traditional Policies. 2017. Retrieved February 16, 2020, from https://www.wiley.law/article-Covering-New-Fraud-Risks-With-Traditional-Policies
Modic D, Anderson R, Palomäki J. We will make you like our research: The development of a susceptibility-to-persuasion scale. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(3),e0194119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194119
Fogg BJ. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do (1st ed.). 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-55860-643-2.X5000-8
Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004;55(1), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2009;24. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02428
Muhammad Abdullahi A, Oyibo K, Orji R. The Influence of Cognitive Ability on the Susceptibility to Persuasive Strategies. Proceedings of the Personalization in Persuasive Technology Workshop. 2018. Retrieved from: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2089/3_Abdullahi.pdf
Anderson KB. Mass-Market Consumer Fraud: Who Is Most Susceptible to Becoming a Victim? (332). 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/mass-market-consumer-fraud-who-most-susceptible-becoming-victim/working_paper_332.pdf
Modic D, Lea SEG. Scam Compliance and the Psychology of Persuasion. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364464
Cialdini RB. Influence: science and practice (4th Ed.). Boston, MA; London: Allyn and Bacon. 2001.
Batra R, Homer PM, Kahle LR. Values, Susceptibility to Normative Influence, and Attribute Importance Weights: A Nomological Analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2001;11(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1102_04
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Feng Kao C. The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1984;48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
Cialdini RB, Trost MR, Newsom JT. Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1248
Andrews JC. The Dimensionality of Beliefs toward Advertising in General Journal of Advertising. 1989;18(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1989.10673140
Zimmermann G. Risk perception, emotion regulation, and impulsivity as predictors of risk behaviours among adolescents in Switzerland. Journal of Youth Studies. 2010;13(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903173488
Fischer P, Kubitzki J, Guter S, Frey D. Virtual driving and risk taking: Do racing games increase risk-taking cognitions, affect, and behaviors? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2007;13(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.1.22
Weber EU, Blais AR, Betz NE. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2002,15(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414
Thaler RH, Shefrin HM. An Economic Theory of Self-Control. Journal of Political Economy. 1981;89(2), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1086/260971
Tangney JP. Moral affect: The good, the bad and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991;61(4), 598–60. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35126.96.36.1998
Arnett J. Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 1994;16(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90165-1
Tian KT, Bearden WO, Hunter GL. Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research. 2001,28(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1086/321947
Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS. The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66(4), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.522
Taylor SE, Brown JD. Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
Tsukayama E, Duckworth AL, Kim B. Resisting Everything Except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain-specific Impulsivity. European Journal of Personality. 2011;26(3),318–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.841
Whitty MT. Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2018;21(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0729
Whitty MT. Predicting susceptibility to cyber-fraud victimhood. Journal of Financial Crime. 2019;26(1), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-10-2017-0095
Williams EJ, Beardmore A, Joinson AN. Individual differences in susceptibility to online influence: A theoretical review. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;72, 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.002
Van de Weijer SGA, Leukfeldt ER. Big Five Personality Traits of Cybercrime Victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2017;20(7), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0028
Mogaji E, Danbury A. Making the brand appealing: advertising strategies and consumers’ attitude towards UK retail bank brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 2017;26(6), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-07-2016-1285
Zhang Meadows C. The Effects of Fear Appeals and Message Format on Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention Behaviors among College Students. Societies. 2020;10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10010021
Sinha K, Sinha T, Sahdeo SN. Emotional and Fear Appeal in Advertising is an Effective Approach to Aware against Air Pollution in Society. International Journal of Applied Marketing and Management. 2017;2(2). Retrieved from: http://www.publishingindia.com/ ijamm/96/emotional-and-fear-appeal-in-advertising-is-an-effective-approach-to-aware-against-air-pollution-in-society/638/4505/
Raza SH, Abu Bakar H, Mohamad B. Relationships between the Advertising Appeal and Behavioral Intention: The Mediating Role of the Attitude towards Advertising Appeal. SHS Web of Conferences. 2017;33. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173300022
Maddux JE, Rogers RW. Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1983;19(5),469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9
Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs; 1992;59,225-249.
Jansen J, Schaik PV. Persuading end users to act cautiously online: Initial findings of a fear appeals study on phishing. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security & Assurance (HAISA 2017). 2017.
Ngondo PS, Klyueva A Fear appeals in road safety advertising: an analysis of a controversial social marketing campaign in Russia. Russian Journal of Communication. 2019;11(2),167–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2018.1555772
Qahtani EA, Shehab M, Aljohani A. The Effectiveness of Fear Appeals in Increasing Smartphone Locking Behavior among Saudi Arabians. USENIX Security Symposium 2018. 2018.
Wall JD, Buche MW. To fear or not to fear? A critical review and analysis of fear appeals in the information security context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2017;41,277–300. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.04113
Shin S, Ki EJ, Griffin WG. The effectiveness of fear appeals in ‘green’ advertising: An analysis of creative, consumer, and source variables. Journal of Marketing Communications. 2017;23(5),473–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2017.1290671
Meinard Y, Tsoukiàs A. On the rationality of decision aiding processes. European Journal of Operational Research. 2019;273(3),1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.009
Shukor MS, Sulaiman, Zuraidah, Thoo AC, Zakuan N. The effect of emotional versus rational appeal in advertising on Malaysian consumers purchase intention of hybrid car. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2016;11(24). Retrieved from: http://www.arpnjournals.org/ jeas/research_papers/rp_2016/jeas_1216_5504.pdf
Kabir SMS. Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines (1st ed.). Chittagong, Bangladesh: Book Zone Publication. 2016.
Brown GTL, Irving SE, Keegan PJ An Introduction to Educational Assessment Measurement and Evaluation (3rd Ed.). Zaltbommel, Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing. 2014.