Study of the Relationship for Neutron and Proton Skin Thickness on the Neutron Equation of State for 18Ne-18O Pair Mirror Nuclei
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2024.10512Keywords:
Mirror energy displacement, Occupancies, Pair mirror nuclei, Slope parameter, Symmetry energyAbstract
Within the framework of the shell model, the single-particle wave functions of Hartree-Fock approximation adopted with Skyrme interactions like Skxtb, Skxs25, Sly4 and Bsk9 to get the thickness of the neutron skin, the mirror radii and the charges mirror radii for 18Ne-18O pair mirror nucleus. The wave functions were calculated using the NuShellX@MSU shell model code. The computed values of root -mean - square -radii are influenced by the type of interaction employed. The symmetry energy and its slope at nuclear saturation density and the mirror energy displacement were also determined. Comparisons between theoretical and experimental data were made and it was concluded that the data are well described in of this pair mirror nucleus.
Received 26/12/2023
Revised 23/02/2024
Accepted 25/02/2024
Published Online First 20/07/2024
References
Hameed BS, Alwan TA. Study the Nuclear Structure of Some Even-Even Ca Isotopes Using the Microscopic Theory. Baghdad Sci J. 2023; 20(1): 235-244.(10). https://dx.doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2022.6924.
Guan D, Pei J, Jiang C. Implications on Skyrme equations of state from neutron skin measurements. Chin. Phys. C. 2024; 48(6):0641055.
https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.4169.
Hameed BS, Rejah BK. Study the Nuclear Structure of Some Cobalt Isotopes. Baghdad Sci J. 2022; 19(6): 1566. https://dx.doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2022.
Hussein AAM, Flaiyh GN. Theoretical Study of Matter Density Distributions, and Elastic Electron Scattering Form Factors of Exotic Nuclei (26F and 9C). East Eur J Phys. 2023(1): 82-88. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023-1-09.
Raheem S K, Dakhil Z A , Hameed B S. Effect of the Exact Center of Mass Correction on the Longitudinal Form Factors for Neutron Rich 12,14,18N Isotopes. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2021; 1829(1): 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1829/1/012023.
Coraggio L, De Gregorio G, Gargano A, Itaco N, Fukui T, Ma YZ, et al. Shell-model study of calcium isotopes toward their dripline. Phys Rev C. 2020; 102(5): 054326.(9). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054326.
Reinhard P G, Nazarewicz W. Information content of the differences in the charge radii of mirror nuclei. Phys Rev C. 2022; 105(2): 7.https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L021301.
Pineda SV. Constraints on the Neutron Equation of State Using the Difference in 54 Ni-54 Fe Mirror Pair Charge Radii: Michigan State University. Phd thesis .2022;24.
An R, Sun S, Cao L-G, Zhang F-S. Constraining the nuclear symmetry energy with charge radii of the mirror pairs nuclei. Nucl Sci Tech. 2023; 34: 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01269-1.
Mohammed RA, Majeed WZ. Exotic Structure of 17Ne-17N and 23Al-23Ne Mirror Nuclei. East Eur J Phys. 2022; 4 : 72-9.8. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2022-4-05.
Brown BA, Minamisono K, Piekarewicz J , Hergert H, Garand D, Klose A, et al. Implications of the36Ca−36S and 38Ca−38Ar difference in mirror charge radii on the neutron mattere quation of state. Phys Rev Res. 2020; 2: 022035(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022035.
Naito T, Roca-Maza X, Colo G, Liang H, Sagawa H. Isospin symmetry breaking in the charge radius difference of mirror nuclei. Phys Rev C. 2022; 106: L061306. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.L061306.
Brown BA, Radhi R, Wildenthal B H. Electric quadrupole and hexadecupole nuclear excitations from the perspective of electron scattering and modern shell- model theory. Phys Rep. 1983;101 (5):313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(83)90001-7
Brown BA, Rae W. The shell-model code NuShellX@ MSU. Nucl Data Sheets. 2014; 120: 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.022
Abdulhasan AA, Dakhil ZA. Electric quadrupole transition in neutron rich 32−42S-isotopes with different model. Int J Nonlinear Anal Appl. 2022; 13: 3127–3137. https://doi.org/10.22075/IJNAA.2022.6783.
Yao Xua J, Zheng Li Z, Hua Suna B, Fei Niu Y, Roca- Mazac X, Sagawad H, et al. Constraining equation of state of nuclear matter by charge-changing cross section measurements of mirror nuclei. Phys Lett B. 2022; 833: 137333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137333
Kumar P, Bishakha NT, Thakur V, Kumar R, Dhiman SK, editors. A study of trends of neutron skin thickness and proton radii of mirror nuclei. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. On Nucl Phys. 2022; 2:300-301.
Chen L-W, Ko CM, Li B-A. Determination of the stiffness of the nuclear symmetry energy from isospin diffusion. Phys Rev Lett. 2005; 94: 032701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.032701
Bentley MA. Excited States in Isobaric Multiplets-Experimental Advances and the Shell-Model Approach. Physics. 2022; 4(3): 995-1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4030066.
Brown B, Duguet T, Otsuka T, Abe D, Suzuki T. Tensor interaction contributions to single-particle energies. Phys Rev C. 2006; 74(6): 061303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.061303
Brown BA, Shen G, Hillhouse G, Meng J, Trzcińska A. Neutron skin deduced from antiprotonic atom data. Phys. Rev C. 2007; 76(3): 034305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.034305
Chabanat E, Bonche P, Haensel P, Meyer J, Schaeffer R. A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part II. Nuclei far from stabilities. Nucl Phys A. 1998; 635(1-2): 231-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00180-8
Goriely S, Samyn M, Pearson J, Onsi M. Further explorations of Skyrme–Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov mass formulas.IV:Neutron-matterconstraint. Nucl Phys A. 2005; 750(2-4): 425-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.01.009.
Geng J, Xiang J, Sun BY, Long WH. Relativistic Hartree-Fock model for axially deformed nuclei. Phys Rev C. 2020; 101(6): 064302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064302.
Ma H-L, Dong B-G, Yan Y-L, Zhang H-Q, Zhang X-Z. Proton Pygmy Dipole Resonances in 17,18Ne: Collective non collective excitations. Phys Rev C. 2012; 85: 044307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044307.
Angeli I, Marinova KP. Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update. At Data Nucl Data Tables. 2013; 99(1): 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2011.12.006
Ozawa A, Baumann T, Chulkov L, Cortina D, Datta U, Fernandez J, et al. Measurements of the interaction cross sectionsfor ArandCl isotopes. Nucl Phys A. 2002; 709 (1-4): 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01071-0.
Punta P, Lay J A, Moro A M. Transfer reactions of exotic nuclei including core deformations: 11Be and 17C. Phys Rev C. 2023; 108: 024613. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024613.
Hussein AAM, Flaiyh GN. Theoretical Study of Proton Halo Structure and Elastic Electron Scattering Form Factor for 23Al and 27P Nuclei by Using Full Correlation Functions (Tensor Force and Short Range). East Eur J Phys. 2023; 1: 75-8. https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023-1-08.
Gaidarov M, Moumene I, Antonov A, Kadrev D, Sarriguren P, de Guerra EM. Proton and neutron skins and symmetry energy of mirror nuclei. Nucl Phys A. 2020; 1004: 122061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122061.
Reed BT, Fattoyev FJ, Horowitz CJ, Piekarewicz J. Implications of PREX-2 on the equation of state of neutron-rich matter. Phys Rev Lett. 2021; 126; 1-17: 172503.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172503.
Harith RH, Hameed BS. Study of the Symmetry Energy and the Nuclear Equation of State for 13O -13B and 13N-13C Mirror Nuclei. Iraqi J phys. 2023; 21: 24-31. https://doi.org/1030723/ijp.v21i4.1147.
Wang M, Huang WJ, Kondev FG, Audi G, Naimi S. The Ame2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chin Phys C. 2021; 45: 030003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sala Sami Hamza, Ban Sabah Hameed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
