Temperature Stress on Physiological and Morphological Traits in Rhizophora apiculata

Main Article Content

Baseem M. Tamimi
Wan Juliana W. A.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-8682
Nizam M. S.
Che Radziah Che Mohd. Zain

Abstract

Global warming has had considerable effects on vital ecosystems, which has also been caused by increased temperatures and CO2 that follow changes in different abiotic factors, which poses threats to mangrove forests environment. This research was conducted to examine the physiological and morphological characteristics of the Rhizophora apiculata mangrove regarding higher air temperature for the variety of tree species that respond to climate change. Seedlings were cultivated for three months in regulated growth chambers with three varying temperatures of 38°C, 21°C under CO2 at 450 ppm, and ambient CO2 concentration i.e., 450 ± 20 ppm under average temperature at 28°C as the control condition. The plants were treated every 48 hours with 3 L of saline water of 28 ppt. After two weeks at high temperature, the mangrove showed positive results for all parameters. The temperature variations resulted in major variations, such as negative for increased temperature resulting in extreme damage to many samples while positive for decreased temperature resulting in slow development. The physiological results show decreased photosynthesis rates compared to controlled samples. These findings indicate that low photosynthetic capability levels could have occurred due to reduced CO2 fixative reaction mechanism, photosynthetic pigment material, and the discrepancy between respiratory and photosynthesis rate.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Temperature Stress on Physiological and Morphological Traits in Rhizophora apiculata. Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 20 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];18(4(Suppl.):1492. Available from: https://bsj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/BSJ/article/view/5537
Section
article

How to Cite

1.
Temperature Stress on Physiological and Morphological Traits in Rhizophora apiculata. Baghdad Sci.J [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 20 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];18(4(Suppl.):1492. Available from: https://bsj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/BSJ/article/view/5537

References

Asbridge E, Lucas R, Accad A, Dowling R. Mangrove response to environmental changes predicted under varying climates: case studies from Australia. Curr Forestry Rep. 2015;1(3): 178–194.

Cavanaugh KC, Kellner JR, Forde AJ, Gruner DS, Parker JD, Rodriguez W. Poleward expansion of mangroves is a threshold response to decreased frequency of extreme cold events. PNAS. 2014;111(2): 723–727.

Keenan TF, Williams CA. The terrestrial carbon sink. AR. 2018;43: 219–243.

Martin AR, Doraisami M, Thomas SC. Global patterns in wood carbon concentration across the world’s trees and forests. Nature Geoscience. 2018;11(12): 915–920.

Fatichi S, Pappas C, Zscheischler J, Leuzinger S. Modelling carbon sources and sinks in terrestrial vegetation. New Phytologist. 2019; 221(2): 652–668.

Tollefson J. IPCC says limiting global warming to 1.5C will require drastic action. Nature. 2018 Oct 8;562(7726):172-3.

Quéré CL, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Pongratz J, Manning AC. Global carbon budget 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2018;10(1): 405–448.

Quetin GR, Swann ALS. Sensitivity of leaf area to interannual climate variation as a diagnostic of ecosystem function in CMIP5 carbon cycle models. JCLI. 2018;31(20): 8607–8625.

Kattenberg A. Climate models: projections of future climate. AMS, Boston, MA (United States) 1996.

Lovenduski NS, Bonan GB. Reducing uncertainty in projections of terrestrial carbon uptake. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017;12(4): 44020.

Ball MC, Cochrane M, Rawson M. Growth and water use of the mangroves Rhizophora apiculata and R. stylosa in response to salinity and humidity under ambient and elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2. PC&E.1997; 20: 1158–1166. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-144.x

Paliyavuth C, Clough B, Patanaponpaiboon P. Salt uptake and shoot water relations in mangroves. Aquatic Botany. 2004; 78(4): 349–360. doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.01.002.

Ong JE, Gong WK, Wong CH. Allometry and partitioning of the mangrove, Rhizophora apiculata. Forest Ecology and Management . 2004; 188(1–3): 395–408.

Feller IC, Friess DA, Krauss KW, Lewis RR. The state of the world’s mangroves in the 21st century under climate change. Hydrobiologia. 2017; 803(1): 1–12.

Van Lavieren H, Spalding M, Alongi D, Kainuma M, Clüsener-Godt M, Adeel Z. Securing the future of mangroves, a policy brief. UNSECO Hamilton, on Canada. 2012; p53.

Seneviratne SI, Phipps SJ, Pitman AJ, Hirsch AL, Davin EL, Donat MG, et al. Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation. Nat. Geosci. 2018;11(2): 88–96.

NOAA. National Climatic Data Centre. 2015; https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201504.

Kaffashi S. Assessing the impacts of climate change on paddy production in Malaysia. Res. J. Environ. Sci. 2014; 8(6): 331–341.

Rahman HA. Climate Change Scenarios In Malaysia: Engaging The Public. IJoM-NS. 2018;1(2): 55–77.

Murad W, Molla RI, Mokhtar MB, Raquib A. Climate change and agricultural growth: an examination of the link in Malaysia. IJCCSM. 2010.

Crooks S, Herr D, Tamelander J, Laffoley D, Vandever J. Mitigating climate change through restoration and management of coastal wetlands and near-shore marine ecosystems: challenges and opportunities. World Bank 2011.

Wan Juliana WA, Razali MS, Latiff A. Distribution and rarity of Rhizophoraceae in Peninsular Malaysia. Mangrove Ecosystems of Asia. 2014; 23–36. Springer.

Hassan MK, Jintana V, Kuittinen S, Pappinen A. Management Practices and Aboveground Biomass Production Patterns of Rhizophora apiculata Plantation: Study from a Mangrove Area in Samut Songkram Province, Thailand. Bioresources. 2018;13(4): 7826–7850.

Nurdin CM, Ikeu TJ. Chlorophyll level of Various Geen Leaves and Copperchlorophyll Derivates and its Charaterization. JGP. 2009;12(1): 11–12.

Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol.1949; 24(1): 1.

Mackinney G. Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. biol. Chem. 1941;140(2): 315–322.

Friend AD, Eckes-Shephard AH, Fonti P, Rademacher TT, Rathgeber CBK, Richardson AD, et al. On the need to consider wood formation processes in global vegetation models and a suggested approach. Ann. For. Sci. 2019; 76(2): 49.

Zheng Y, Li F, Hao L, Shedayi AA, Guo L, Ma C, et al. The optimal CO2 concentrations for the growth of three perennial grass species. BMC pb. 2018;18(1): 27.

Seftigen K, Frank DC, Björklund J, Babst F, Poulter B. The climatic drivers of normalized difference vegetation index and tree‐ring‐based estimates of forest productivity are spatially coherent but temporally decoupled in Northern Hemispheric forests. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2018;27(11): 1352–1365.

Yamori W, Hikosaka K, Way DA. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth Res. 2014;119(1–2): 101–117.

Tamimi B, WanJuliana WA, Nizam MS, Zain CRCM. Elevated CO2 Concentration and Air Temperature Impacts on Mangrove Plants (Rhizophora apiculata) Under Controlled Environment. IJS. 2019; pp.1658-1666.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.